Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Justin Pilkington v. State of Florida

Justin Pilkington v. State of Florida

186 So. 3d 1114, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3632, 2016 WL 892655
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 2016
Docket4D15-3246
StatusPublished

This text of 186 So. 3d 1114 (Justin Pilkington v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Justin Pilkington v. State of Florida, 186 So. 3d 1114, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3632, 2016 WL 892655 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying appellant’s rule 3.800(a) motion to correct illegal sentence and remand for further proceedings. The court denied the motion without explanation, without ordering a response from the State, and without attaching any records. It is well settled that such an order is improper and subject to summary reversal. Shea v. State, 97 So.3d 861 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012).

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

CIKLIN, C.J., WARNER and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Shea v. State
97 So. 3d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 So. 3d 1114, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 3632, 2016 WL 892655, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-pilkington-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2016.