Justin Pantzer v. State of Florida
This text of Justin Pantzer v. State of Florida (Justin Pantzer v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JUSTIN PANTZER, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-3356
[April 29, 2026]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; William L. Roby, Judge; L.T. Case No. 432007CF001105CFAXMX.
Justin Pantzer, Lake City, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Wainwright v. State, 411 So. 3d 392 (Fla. 2025), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 145 S.Ct. 2789 (2025) (holding that even if Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024), constitutes a change of law, it does not apply retroactively); see also Maye v. State, 368 So. 3d 531, 532 (Fla. 6th DCA 2023), rev. granted, No. SC2023-1184, 2024 WL 1796831 (Fla. Apr. 25, 2024).
KUNTZ, C.J., FORST and SHEPHERD, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Justin Pantzer v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-pantzer-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.