Justin O' Neil v. State of Florida
This text of Justin O' Neil v. State of Florida (Justin O' Neil v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2023-0677 Lower Tribunal No. 20-1375-F _____________________________
JUSTIN O’NEIL,
Appellant,
v. STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County. Scott H. Cupp, Judge.
January 17, 2025
MIZE, J.
The errors asserted by Appellant relating to the merits of his conviction were
not preserved below and, therefore, we review them for fundamental error.1 See
Noetzel v. State, 328 So. 3d 933, 945 (Fla. 2021). We find no fundamental error
with respect to these asserted errors and affirm with respect to them without further
discussion.
1 This case was transferred from the Second District Court of Appeal to this Court on January 1, 2023. Appellant also asserts that the trial court committed fundamental error with
respect to his sentence because the trial court entered a written sentence that did not
comport with its oral pronouncement. However, Appellant did not file a motion
under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) either prior to filing this appeal
or prior to the filing of his initial brief. A defendant may not raise a sentencing error
as fundamental error on appeal if he has not preserved the issue by either filing a
motion under rule 3.800(b) or by objecting during the sentencing hearing. Jackson
v. State, 983 So. 2d 562, 569 (Fla. 2008). Because Appellant did not do so, we affirm
his sentence. This opinion is without prejudice to Appellant filing any appropriate
motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).
AFFIRMED.
NARDELLA and WHITE, JJ., concur.
Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Jean M. Henne, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.
Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Taylor A. Schell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Justin O' Neil v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-o-neil-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.