Justin O' Neil v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 17, 2025
Docket6D2023-0677
StatusPublished

This text of Justin O' Neil v. State of Florida (Justin O' Neil v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Justin O' Neil v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

Case No. 6D2023-0677 Lower Tribunal No. 20-1375-F _____________________________

JUSTIN O’NEIL,

Appellant,

v. STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee. _____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County. Scott H. Cupp, Judge.

January 17, 2025

MIZE, J.

The errors asserted by Appellant relating to the merits of his conviction were

not preserved below and, therefore, we review them for fundamental error.1 See

Noetzel v. State, 328 So. 3d 933, 945 (Fla. 2021). We find no fundamental error

with respect to these asserted errors and affirm with respect to them without further

discussion.

1 This case was transferred from the Second District Court of Appeal to this Court on January 1, 2023. Appellant also asserts that the trial court committed fundamental error with

respect to his sentence because the trial court entered a written sentence that did not

comport with its oral pronouncement. However, Appellant did not file a motion

under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(b) either prior to filing this appeal

or prior to the filing of his initial brief. A defendant may not raise a sentencing error

as fundamental error on appeal if he has not preserved the issue by either filing a

motion under rule 3.800(b) or by objecting during the sentencing hearing. Jackson

v. State, 983 So. 2d 562, 569 (Fla. 2008). Because Appellant did not do so, we affirm

his sentence. This opinion is without prejudice to Appellant filing any appropriate

motion under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a).

AFFIRMED.

NARDELLA and WHITE, JJ., concur.

Blair Allen, Public Defender, and Jean M. Henne, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Taylor A. Schell, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jackson v. State
33 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 357 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Justin O' Neil v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-o-neil-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.