Justin Mays v. State of Arkansas

2024 Ark. 160
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 24, 2024
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2024 Ark. 160 (Justin Mays v. State of Arkansas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Justin Mays v. State of Arkansas, 2024 Ark. 160 (Ark. 2024).

Opinion

Cite as 2024 Ark. 160 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CR-24-97

Opinion Delivered: October 24, 2024 JUSTIN MAYS APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 60CR-21-3881]

STATE OF ARKANSAS HONORABLE KAREN D. WHATLEY, APPELLEE JUDGE

REMANDED TO SETTLE AND SUPPLEMENT THE RECORD.

PER CURIAM

A Pulaski County Circuit Court jury convicted appellant Justin Mays of one count

of capital murder, two counts of terroristic act, and one count of first-degree battery. Mays

was sentenced to a term of life imprisonment without the possibility of parole plus a 120-

month enhancement, pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-90-120(a)–(b)

(Repl. 2016), to run consecutively. We remand to settle and supplement the record.

Arkansas Supreme Court Rule 3-4(c)(2) states that when there is a jury trial, the

“[v]erdict forms shall be inserted in the record.” We have reviewed the record, and the

jury-verdict forms are not included in the record of the circuit court proceedings. See Ark.

Sup. Ct. R. 4-3(a) (requiring this court to conduct an independent review of the record for

prejudicial error in life and death cases). Therefore, we must remand this case to settle and

supplement the record in accordance with Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Civil 6(e),

as applicable through Arkansas Rule of Appellate Procedure–Criminal 4(a). See Ross v. State, 2024 Ark. 70, at 1. Accordingly, Mays has thirty days from the date of this opinion to file a

supplemental record with this court. We encourage review of our rules to ensure that no

other deficiencies are present.

James Law Firm, by: William O. “Bill” James, Jr., and Drew Curtis, for appellant.

Tim Griffin, Att’y Gen., by: Michael Zangari, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Justin Mays v. State of Arkansas
2025 Ark. 24 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2025)
Warren Goodrum v. State of Arkansas
2024 Ark. 170 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2024)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2024 Ark. 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-mays-v-state-of-arkansas-ark-2024.