Justin Jones v. Raylina Ramsey

660 F. App'x 486
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 2016
Docket16-1570
StatusUnpublished

This text of 660 F. App'x 486 (Justin Jones v. Raylina Ramsey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Justin Jones v. Raylina Ramsey, 660 F. App'x 486 (8th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

[Unpublished]

PER CURIAM.

Arkansas inmate Justin Jones appeals the district court’s 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review, we find no error in the district court’s decision, See Murchison v, Rogers, 719 F.3d 882, 886-87 (8th Cir. 2015) (viewing summary judgment record in light most favorable to non-movant, and drawing all reasonable inferences from it in his favor).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Joe J. Volpe, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pur- ' suant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
660 F. App'x 486, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-jones-v-raylina-ramsey-ca8-2016.