Justin Hammett v. Paulding County, Georgia
This text of 886 F.3d 1335 (Justin Hammett v. Paulding County, Georgia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The Petition(s) for Rehearing are DENIED and no Judge in regular active service on the Court having requested that the Court be polled on rehearing en banc ( Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure ), the Petition(s) for Rehearing En Banc are DENIED. **
The opinion and decision in this case do not decide that physical evidence could never sufficiently contradict sworn, eyewitness, personal-knowledge testimony so as to justify a denial of summary judgment. The inferences that might be reasonably drawn from the pertinent physical evidence here, however, are insufficient to support plaintiff's theory about the shooting incident underlying this case. Plaintiff's theory projects too far past the limits of the evidence that he has actually presented.
Judge Williams would grant the motion for panel rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
886 F.3d 1335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-hammett-v-paulding-county-georgia-ca11-2018.