Justin Grimsrud v. Department of Transportation
This text of Justin Grimsrud v. Department of Transportation (Justin Grimsrud v. Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Merit Systems Protection Board primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD
JUSTIN GRIMSRUD, DOCKET NUMBER Appellant, NY-0752-14-0340-I-1
v.
DEPARTMENT OF DATE: January 6, 2017 TRANSPORTATION, Agency.
Mordy Yankovich, Esquire, Garden City, New York, for the appellant. Christian Lewerenz, Esquire, Jamaica, New York, for the agency.
BEFORE
Susan Tsui Grundmann, Chairman Mark A. Robbins, Member
ORDER ¶1 The appellant has filed a petition for review of the initial decision, which sustained his removal. The two Board members cannot agree on the disposition of the petition for review. Therefore, the initial decision now becomes the final decision of the Merit Systems Protection Board in this appeal. Title 5 of the Code of Federal Regulations, section 1200.3(b) (5 C.F.R. § 1200.3(b)). This decision shall not be considered as precedent by the Board in any other case. 5 C.F.R. § 1200.3(d). 2
NOTICE TO THE APPELLANT REGARDING YOUR FURTHER REVIEW RIGHTS You have the right to request review of the final decision by the U .S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. You must submit your reques t to the court at the following address: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 717 Madison Place, N.W. Washington, DC 20439
The court must receive your request for review no later than 60 calendar days after the date of this order. See 5 U.S.C. § 7703(b)(1)(A) (as rev. eff. Dec. 27, 2012). If you choose to file, be very careful to file on time. The court has held that normally it does not have the authority to waive this statutory deadline and that filings that do not comply with the deadline must be dismissed. See Pinat v. Office of Personnel Management, 931 F.2d 1544 (Fed. Cir. 1991). If you need further information about your right to appeal this decision to court, you should refer to the Federal law that gives you this right. It is found in title 5 of the United States Code, section 7703 (5 U.S.C. § 7703) (as rev. eff. Dec. 27, 2012). You may read this law as well as other sections o f the United States Code, at our website, http://www.mspb.gov/appeals/uscode/htm. Additional information is available at the court’s website, www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Of particular relevance is the court’s “Guide for Pro Se Petitioners and Appellants,” which is contained within the court’s Rules of Practice, and Forms 5, 6, and 11. If you are interested in securing pro bono representation for an appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, you may visit our website at http://www.mspb.gov/probono for information regarding pro bono representation for Merit Systems Protection Board appellants before the Federal Circuit. The 3
Merit Systems Protection Board neither endorses the services provided by any attorney nor warrants that any attorney will accept representation in a given case.
FOR THE BOARD: ______________________________ Jennifer Everling Acting Clerk of the Board Washington, D.C.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Justin Grimsrud v. Department of Transportation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-grimsrud-v-department-of-transportation-mspb-2017.