Justin Dunway Friar v. the State of Texas
This text of Justin Dunway Friar v. the State of Texas (Justin Dunway Friar v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo
No. 07-22-00213-CR No. 07-22-00214-CR No. 07-22-00215-CR
JUSTIN DUNWAY FRIAR, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
On Appeal from the 452nd District Court McCulloch County, Texas Trial Court Nos. 6707, 6708, & 6709; Honorable Robert R. Hofmann, Presiding
February 1, 2023 ORDER OF ABATEMENT AND REMAND Before PARKER and DOSS and YARBROUGH, JJ.
Appellant, Justin Dunway Friar, appeals1 his convictions for aggravated assault on
a public servant,2 evading arrest or detention with a motor vehicle, 3 and unlawful
1 Originally appealed to the Third Court of Appeals, this appeal was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalizations efforts. See TEX. GOV’T CODE ANN. § 73.001. 2 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 22.01(b)(2)(B). 3 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 38.04(b)(2)(A). possession of a firearm.4 Appellant is represented by appointed counsel, John Matthews.
On January 26, 2023, D. Rudolph Taylor, Jr., filed a motion seeking to substitute as
Appellant’s counsel in each appeal. The motion provides that Appellant’s family hired
Taylor to represent Appellant and that Taylor has been unable to communicate with
Matthews.
The trial court has responsibility for appointing counsel to represent indigent
defendants in criminal cases, as well as the authority to relieve or replace appointed
counsel. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2). We, thus, abate the
appeals and remand the causes to the trial court to rule on the motion to substitute
Appellant’s counsel. Upon remand, the trial court shall determine (1) whether Appellant
still desires to prosecute the appeals; (2) whether Appellant has retained counsel to
prosecute the appeals; (3) if so, whether Appellant remains indigent and entitled to
appointed counsel; and (4) whether to dismiss appointed counsel. See TEX. CODE CRIM.
PROC. ANN. arts. 1.051(d), 26.04(j)(2).
The trial court may also enter such orders necessary to address the
aforementioned questions. The trial court’s findings and any orders issued shall be
included in a supplemental clerk’s record to be filed with this Court by March 3, 2023.
All other appellate deadlines are suspended until further order of this Court.
It is so ordered.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
4 See TEX. PENAL CODE ANN. § 46.04(e).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Justin Dunway Friar v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-dunway-friar-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2023.