Justin Curinton v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 15, 2018·No. 17-4211·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________

No. 1D17-4211 _____________________________

JUSTIN CURINTON,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. _____________________________

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.

August 15, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

B.L. THOMAS, C.J., and OSTERHAUS and BILBREY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331. _____________________________ Justin Curinton, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Samuel B. Steinberg, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Justin Curinton v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Justin Curinton v. State of Florida (Justin Curinton v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.