Justin Corpus v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 19, 2003
Docket07-02-00475-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Justin Corpus v. State (Justin Corpus v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Justin Corpus v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

NO. 07-02-0475-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL E

MARCH 19, 2003

______________________________

JUSTIN CORPUS, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

_________________________________

FROM THE 286TH DISTRICT COURT OF HOCKLEY COUNTY;

NO. 02-01-5222; HONORABLE ANDY KUPPER, JUDGE

_______________________________

Before REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1

ON ABATEMENT AND REMAND

Appellant Justin Corpus was convicted of murder on October 15, 2002, and

sentenced to 40 years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Department of

1 John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. Tex. Gov’t Code Ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2003). Criminal Justice. Appellant timely perfected his appeal. Nothing further has been done

to perfect the appeal. Although at the request of the district clerk we have previously

granted appellant an extension of time to March 3, 2003, to allow appellant to make

arrangements for payment of the record, we have now received a notification from the

district clerk that appellant has not paid or made arrangements to pay for the record.

This state of the proceedings requires us to abate the appeal and remand the case

to the 286th District Court of Hockley County to conduct hearings as mandated by Texas

Rule of Appellate Procedure 37.3(a)(2) and 38.8.

Upon remand, the judge of the trial court shall immediately cause proper notices to

be given and conduct a hearing to determine:

1. If appellant still desires to pursue his appeal.

2. If appellant is indigent and the appointment of an attorney is necessary.

3. If it be determined that an attorney should be appointed, the name, address, and State Bar of Texas identification number of the attorney appointed.

4. If appellant is not indigent, whether he has failed to make the necessary arrangements for prosecuting his appeal, and, if he has not done so, what orders are necessary to ensure those arrangements are made.

5. If any other orders are necessary to ensure the diligent and proper pursuit of appellant’s appeal.

In support of its determinations, the trial court shall prepare and file written findings

of fact and conclusions of law and cause them to be included in a supplemental clerk’s

record. The hearing proceedings shall be transcribed and included in a supplemental

2 reporter’s record. These supplemental records shall be submitted to this court not later

than April 18, 2003.

It is so ordered.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Justin Corpus v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-corpus-v-state-texapp-2003.