JUSTIN CLAY PANTZER v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of JUSTIN CLAY PANTZER v. STATE OF FLORIDA (JUSTIN CLAY PANTZER v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
JUSTIN CLAY PANTZER, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D23-407
[April 27, 2023]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 432007CF001105A.
Justin Clay Pantzer, Raiford, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
WARNER, FORST and ARTAU, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
JUSTIN CLAY PANTZER v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justin-clay-pantzer-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2023.