Justin C. Radwin v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 18, 2010·No. 04-10-00547-CR·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00547-CR

Justin C. RADWIN, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 187th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CR-6827 Honorable Raymond Angelini, Judge Presiding

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 18, 2010

DISMISSED

The trial court’s certification in this appeal states that the case is a “plea-bargain case, and

the defendant has NO right of appeal.” Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure

provides, “[t]he appeal must be dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right

of appeal has not been made part of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d).

Appellant’s counsel has filed written notice with this court that counsel has reviewed the

record and “can find no right of appeal for Appellant.” We construe this notice as an indication 04-10-00547-CR

that appellant will not seek to file an amended trial court certification showing that he has the

right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174,

177 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 2003, no pet.). In light of the record presented, we agree with

appellant’s counsel that Rule 25.2(d) requires this court to dismiss this appeal. Accordingly, this

appeal is dismissed.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Justin C. Radwin v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Justin C. Radwin v. State (Justin C. Radwin v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)