Justice v. United States
This text of Justice v. United States (Justice v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED 8/25/2020 Clerk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Court for the District of Columbia FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ROBERT V. JUSTICE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 20-2301 (UNA) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff’s application for leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and pro se complaint. The application will be granted, and the
complaint will be dismissed.
Plaintiff alleges that he is “no longer a productive member of the State,” Compl. ¶ 4, and
considers it his “duty to the State . . . not to become a burden on it,” id. ¶ 6. For this reason,
plaintiff allegedly “has a duty and privilege to purge (euthanize) himself.” Id. He asks the Court
to issue an Order “[t]hat any hospital of [his] choosing and . . . instruction . . . shall administer
pentobarbital to end his life.” Id. This is a matter over which the Court lacks jurisdiction, and
the complaint must be dismissed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3).
A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
DATE: August 25, 2020 /s/ COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Justice v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justice-v-united-states-dcd-2020.