Justice v. Suter
This text of Justice v. Suter (Justice v. Suter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED
MAY - 2 2012 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT cl 8 k, _ - - FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Cour'ts gr$t-hl;l§)t|jr;;:rt|_ca; (L:;~i§l(<]r'uptl<;y um ia
AL()NZO N. JUSTICE, ) )
Plaintiff, )
)
v, ) Civil Action N0. 12-0557
WILLIAM K. SUTER, el al., ) )
Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the Court would consider the plaintiffs complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperz`s, the plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(a)(2). Although the plaintiff has submitted an additional document titled "Obj ection to the Court’s Order of 4-1 l-2()l2 Pursuant to Fed. Rule of Civil P. 60(b)(4)(d)(l)," to date he has not submitted the required financial information. Accordingly, the Court will deny his application to proceed in forma pauperis and
will dismiss the complaint without prejudice
An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
Qé@i,s\ United States District Jud `\ DATE;@/fj,@ BD/ <»Zz>/,,l
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Justice v. Suter, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justice-v-suter-dcd-2012.