Justice v. Pope

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 12, 2008·No. 07-2065·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-2065

THEODORE JUSTICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

ART POPE, in his individual and official capacity; JACK S. HOLMES, in his individual and official capacity; NANCY WELLS, in her individual and official capacity; CARON CROSS, in her individual and official capacity; DAWN STEADMAN, in her individual and official capacity; KRISTEN MCRAY, in her individual and official capacity; BUCK LATTIMORE, in his individual and official capacity; TRACY WEAVER, in her individual and official capacity, and others sued in their individual and official capacities,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (5:07-cv-00251-FL)

Submitted: January 24, 2008 Decided: February 12, 2008

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Theodore Justice, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Theodore Justice appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915(e)(2)(B). We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by

the district court. Justice v. Pope, No. 5:07-cv-00251-FL

(E.D.N.C. July 2, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Justice v. Pope, (4th Cir. 2008).

Justice v. Pope (Justice v. Pope) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related