Justice v. Parshall

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Justice v. Parshall

137 N.W. 1116, 119 Minn. 533, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 523

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedOctober 25, 1912

DocketNos. 17,773—(50)

StatusPublished

This text of 137 N.W. 1116 (Justice v. Parshall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Justice v. Parshall, 137 N.W. 1116, 119 Minn. 533, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 523 (Mich. 1912).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The question presented to the court below in this case was one of fact, namely, whether in the transaction involved in the action defendant was acting as a broker for the sale of plaintiff’s property, or whether he purchased the property outright. The jury solved the question in defendant’s favor. Our examination of the record discloses ample evidence to sustain the verdict. There were no reversible errors in the rulings of the court or in its instructions to the jury.

•Order affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The question presented to the court below in this case was one of fact, namely, whether in the transaction involved in the action defendant was acting as a broker for the sale of plaintiff’s property, or whether he purchased the property outright. The jury solved the question in defendant’s favor. Our examination of the record discloses ample evidence to sustain the verdict. There were no reversible errors in the rulings of the court or in its instructions to the jury.

•Order affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

137 N.W. 1116, 119 Minn. 533, 1912 Minn. LEXIS 523, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justice-v-parshall-minn-1912.