Justice v. North Carolina

629 F. App'x 577
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 19, 2016
DocketNo. 15-2195
StatusPublished

This text of 629 F. App'x 577 (Justice v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Justice v. North Carolina, 629 F. App'x 577 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theodore Justice appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as frivolous Justice’s claim for relief in the form of a petition for writ of mandamus and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Justice v. North Carolina, No. 5:15-cv-00046-F, 2015 WL 5513581 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
629 F. App'x 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justice-v-north-carolina-ca4-2016.