Justice v. North Carolina
This text of 629 F. App'x 577 (Justice v. North Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Theodore Justice appeals from the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing as frivolous Justice’s claim for relief in the form of a petition for writ of mandamus and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Justice v. North Carolina, No. 5:15-cv-00046-F, 2015 WL 5513581 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 16, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
629 F. App'x 577, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justice-v-north-carolina-ca4-2016.