Justice v. Justice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Justice v. Justice

163 A.D. 877

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1914

StatusPublished

This text of 163 A.D. 877 (Justice v. Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Justice v. Justice, 163 A.D. 877 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff, having been denied the right to frame issues because his complaint was not definite enough and was too general, should now be allowed to make his complaint more definite so that he may comply with the rule laid down by the judge at Special Term and have issues framed. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed and the motion granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Order reversed, and motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The plaintiff, having been denied the right to frame issues because his complaint was not definite enough and was too general, should now be allowed to make his complaint more definite so that he may comply with the rule laid down by the judge at Special Term and have issues framed. The order appealed from is, therefore, reversed and the motion granted. Present—Ingraham, P. J., Laughlin, Clarke, Scott and Dowling, JJ. Order reversed, and motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

163 A.D. 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justice-v-justice-nyappdiv-1914.