Justice v. Justice

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Justice v. Justice

211 S.W. 419, 184 Ky. 130, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 27

CourtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky

DecidedMay 2, 1919

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 211 S.W. 419 (Justice v. Justice) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Justice v. Justice, 211 S.W. 419, 184 Ky. 130, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 27 (Ky. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion op the Court by

William: Rogers Olay, Commissioner

Granting the petition for rehearing and reversing.

In our former opinion we held that the appeal should be dismissed because of appellant’s failure to execute the supersedeas bond required by subsection 12, sec. 1596a, Kentucky Statutes (inadvertently referred to as subsection 28, sec. 1550). Upon a re-examination of the record we find that appellant did execute a bond to appellee with good surety, conditioned for the payment of .all costs and damages that appellee might sustain by reason of the appeal.While the statute requires that the bond be executed “to the clerk,” we held in the recent case of Felts v. Edwards, 181 Ky. 287, 204 S. W. 145, that the word “to” in the statute was inadvertently used for the word “before,” and that a bond executed to the appellee was sufficient. It follows that we were in error in dismissing the appeal because a proper appeal bond had not been executed.

[131]*131Considering the case on its merits, we find that appellee failed to file with the clerk of the Pike county court his certificate of nomination fifteen days before the regular election. The statute requiring this to be done is mandatory, and where a nominee fails to comply with the statute, the clerk of the county court has no authority to place his name on the ballot. Sec. 1456, Kentucky Statutes; Brody v. Hook, 121 S. W. 879; Daniels v. Blankenship, 198 S. W. 48; King v. MacMahan, 179 Ky. 536, 200 S. W. 956. Though appellee received a greater number of votes than appellant, the votes cast for appellee cannot be counted since his name was not lawfully on the ballot. It therefore follows that appellant, who received a majority of the legal votes cast, should have been declared elected. King v. MacMahan, supra.

Wherefore, the petition for rehearing is granted, the former opinion withdrawn, and the judgment reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion op the Court by

William: Rogers Olay, Commissioner

Granting the petition for rehearing and reversing.

In our former opinion we held that the appeal should be dismissed because of appellant’s failure to execute the supersedeas bond required by subsection 12, sec. 1596a, Kentucky Statutes (inadvertently referred to as subsection 28, sec. 1550). Upon a re-examination of the record we find that appellant did execute a bond to appellee with good surety, conditioned for the payment of .all costs and damages that appellee might sustain by reason of the appeal.While the statute requires that the bond be executed “to the clerk,” we held in the recent case of Felts v. Edwards, 181 Ky. 287, 204 S. W. 145, that the word “to” in the statute was inadvertently used for the word “before,” and that a bond executed to the appellee was sufficient. It follows that we were in error in dismissing the appeal because a proper appeal bond had not been executed.

[131]*131Considering the case on its merits, we find that appellee failed to file with the clerk of the Pike county court his certificate of nomination fifteen days before the regular election. The statute requiring this to be done is mandatory, and where a nominee fails to comply with the statute, the clerk of the county court has no authority to place his name on the ballot. Sec. 1456, Kentucky Statutes; Brody v. Hook, 121 S. W. 879; Daniels v. Blankenship, 198 S. W. 48; King v. MacMahan, 179 Ky. 536, 200 S. W. 956. Though appellee received a greater number of votes than appellant, the votes cast for appellee cannot be counted since his name was not lawfully on the ballot. It therefore follows that appellant, who received a majority of the legal votes cast, should have been declared elected. King v. MacMahan, supra.

Wherefore, the petition for rehearing is granted, the former opinion withdrawn, and the judgment reversed and the cause remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

211 S.W. 419, 184 Ky. 130, 1919 Ky. LEXIS 27, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justice-v-justice-kyctapp-1919.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack