Justice v. Dobrowski

Fourth Circuit

Justice v. Dobrowski

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 19, 2004

Docket04-6060

StatusUnpublished

This text of Justice v. Dobrowski (Justice v. Dobrowski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Justice v. Dobrowski, (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6060

LARRY DYNELL JUSTICE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

OFFICER MIKE DOBROWSKI,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District Judge. (CA-03-866-2)

Submitted: March 11, 2004 Decided: March 19, 2004

Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Dynell Justice, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Larry Dynell Justice appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See

Justice v. Dobrowski, No. CA-03-866-2 (E.D. Va. filed Dec. 11, 2003

& entered Dec. 12, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI