Justice v. Chattooga Oil Mill Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Justice v. Chattooga Oil Mill Co.

79 S.E. 223, 13 Ga. App. 389, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 168

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 9, 1913

Docket4898

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 S.E. 223 (Justice v. Chattooga Oil Mill Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Justice v. Chattooga Oil Mill Co., 79 S.E. 223, 13 Ga. App. 389, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 168 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

1. The general rule -which puts upon the party alleging payment the burden to prove it applies to a subscriber of stock in a corporation when sued by the corporation on his written subscription for the stock. Tippin v. Brockwell, 89 Ga. 467 (15 S. E. 539).

2. Where a subscriber to the stock of a corporation was sued by the corporation on his unconditional written subscription for the stock, and his execution of the contract of subscription was proved, and the contract was introduced in evidence, and no plea of payment or other defense was made, the court did not err in directing a verdict for the plaintiff. Judgment affirmed.

Appeal; from Chattooga superior court — Judge Wright. March 11, 1913.

O. D. Rivers, for plaintiff in error. Ennis & Shaw, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI