Justice ex rel. Bronson, Hoyt & McEntire v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Justice ex rel. Bronson, Hoyt & McEntire v. Hamilton

67 N.C. 111

DecidedJune 15, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 67 N.C. 111 (Justice ex rel. Bronson, Hoyt & McEntire v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Justice ex rel. Bronson, Hoyt & McEntire v. Hamilton, 67 N.C. 111 (N.C. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Ebade, J.

Th-e ©nly question necessary to be considered is] whether voluntary payment of the amount of the notes sued on to the Confederate Eeceiver, was a satisfaction of th©: notes [112]*112as against the beneficial plaintiffs' who were not citizens of the Confederate Government ? His Honor was oi opinion with the plaintiffs ; and we are of the same opinion, for the reason that the payment was neither to the plaintiff nor any agent of liis. See Ward v. Branch, Phil. Eq. 71. Blackwell v. Willard, 65 N. C. R. 555.

There is no error.

Pee Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ebade, J.

Th-e ©nly question necessary to be considered is] whether voluntary payment of the amount of the notes sued on to the Confederate Eeceiver, was a satisfaction of th©: notes [112]*112as against the beneficial plaintiffs' who were not citizens of the Confederate Government ? His Honor was oi opinion with the plaintiffs ; and we are of the same opinion, for the reason that the payment was neither to the plaintiff nor any agent of liis. See Ward v. Branch, Phil. Eq. 71. Blackwell v. Willard, 65 N. C. R. 555.

There is no error.

Pee Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 N.C. 111, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justice-ex-rel-bronson-hoyt-mcentire-v-hamilton-nc-1872.