Justice Administrative Commission v. Grover
This text of 12 So. 3d 1256 (Justice Administrative Commission v. Grover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner, the Justice Administrative Commission (JAC), seeks a writ of certio-rari to quash the circuit court’s order requiring JAC to pay certain attorney’s fees for court-appointed counsel for an indigent in a dependency proceeding in the circuit court. The object of the court-appointed representation was a grandmother who was undoubtedly entitled to participate in the dependency proceeding concerning her minor grandchildren. Nevertheless, the grandmother was not entitled to court-appointed representation in this case, as she did not fall under the category of persons who qualify for court-appointed counsel at public expense. See § 27.40(1), Fla. Stat. (2008). JAC was not, therefore, pursuant to its statutory authorization, required to reimburse appointed counsel in this case. We agree with JAC that the decision in Justice Administrative Commission v. Peterson, 989 So.2d 663 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008), is on point and was correctly decided. We therefore issue the writ, and QUASH the order directing JAC to make payment to respondent attorney for her representation of the grandmother.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
12 So. 3d 1256, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 8629, 2009 WL 1770155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/justice-administrative-commission-v-grover-fladistctapp-2009.