Just Vs. First 100, Llc

Nevada Supreme Court

Just Vs. First 100, Llc

479 P.3d 1004

CourtNevada Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 10, 2021

Docket81717

StatusPublished

This text of 479 P.3d 1004 (Just Vs. First 100, Llc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Just Vs. First 100, Llc, 479 P.3d 1004 (Neb. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOEL JUST, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND No. 81717 EAGLE ROCK ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, A FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellants, vs. FIRST 100, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED FILE LIABILITY COMPANY; AND 1ST ONE FEB 1 0 2021 HUNDRED HOLDINGS, LLC, A ELIZABETH A. BROWN NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY CLERK,' FAJPREME COURT BY COMPANY, DEPUTY CLEr.111-1 7.1(

Res a ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an order granting in part a motion for attorney fees and costs and an amended judgment awarding additional fees and costs. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark R. Denton, Judge. Initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect; it appeared that the challenged orders are not substantively appealable. Although appellants indicated in their docketing statement that the orders are appealable as special orders after final judgment, see NRAP 3A(b)(8), it appeared that no final judgment has been entered in this matter because the claims against Kregg Hale remain pending in the district court. In the absence of a final judgrnent, there can be no special order after final judgment. Accordingly, this court ordered appellants to show cause, by January 27, 2021, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of j urisdiction. This court cautioned

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 44tega 1 -01-11)11-k that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction could result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellants have not filed a response to our order to show cause or otherwise communicated with this court. As appellants fail to demonstrate that the claims against Hale have been resolved by the district court, and thus that a final judgment has been entered, it appears that the orders challenged in this appeal are not appealable as special orders after final judgment. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Parraguirre

Al‘ J. Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Janet Trost, Settlement Judge Takos Law Group, Ltd. Maier Gutierrez & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk

(0) 1947A 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOEL JUST, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND No. 81717 EAGLE ROCK ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, A FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellants, vs. FIRST 100, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED FILE LIABILITY COMPANY; AND 1ST ONE FEB 1 0 2021 HUNDRED HOLDINGS, LLC, A ELIZABETH A. BROWN NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY CLERK,' FAJPREME COURT BY COMPANY, DEPUTY CLEr.111-1 7.1(

Res a ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an order granting in part a motion for attorney fees and costs and an amended judgment awarding additional fees and costs. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark R. Denton, Judge. Initial review of the docketing statement and documents before this court revealed a potential jurisdictional defect; it appeared that the challenged orders are not substantively appealable. Although appellants indicated in their docketing statement that the orders are appealable as special orders after final judgment, see NRAP 3A(b)(8), it appeared that no final judgment has been entered in this matter because the claims against Kregg Hale remain pending in the district court. In the absence of a final judgrnent, there can be no special order after final judgment. Accordingly, this court ordered appellants to show cause, by January 27, 2021, why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of j urisdiction. This court cautioned

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 44tega 1 -01-11)11-k that failure to demonstrate that this court has jurisdiction could result in the dismissal of this appeal. To date, appellants have not filed a response to our order to show cause or otherwise communicated with this court. As appellants fail to demonstrate that the claims against Hale have been resolved by the district court, and thus that a final judgment has been entered, it appears that the orders challenged in this appeal are not appealable as special orders after final judgment. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Parraguirre

Al‘ J. Stiglich Silver

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Janet Trost, Settlement Judge Takos Law Group, Ltd. Maier Gutierrez & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk

(0) 1947A 2

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

479 P.3d 1004, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/just-vs-first-100-llc-nev-2021.