Just Vs. First 100, Llc

475 P.3d 774
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 20, 2020
Docket81237
StatusPublished

This text of 475 P.3d 774 (Just Vs. First 100, Llc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Just Vs. First 100, Llc, 475 P.3d 774 (Neb. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOEL JUST, AN INDIVIDUAL; AND No. 81237 EAGLE ROCK ASSET MANAGEMENT, LLC, A FOREIGN LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellants, FILE' vs. NOV 2 0 2020 FIRST 100, LLC, A NEVADA LIMITED ELIZA9 rri BROWN LIABILITY COMPANY; AND 1ST ONE CLERK OF ;.1UPREME COURT DY HUNDRED HOLDINGS, LLC, A EP CLERK

NEVADA LIMITED LIABILITY COMPA NY, Res • ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from a district court findings of fact and conclusions of law and judgment. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Mark R. Denton, Judge. This court previously entered orders directing appellants to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. In the latest-filed order, this court indicated that the claims against Kregg Hale appeared to remain pending in the district court such that no final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1) has been entered by the district court. Although the claims against Hale were removed to arbitration, no written, file-stamped order formally dismissing or otherwise resolving the claims against Hale appeared to have been entered by the district court. In response, appellants assert the claims were resolved in the March 11, 2015, district court order removing the claims to arbitration. The order removing the claims against Hale to arbitration does not formally dismiss or otherwise resolve the claims. It thus appears that SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A PaP4 70 • ••••;77-*/-:',,1 7. t ft.; •- t the claims against Hale remain pending in the district court and no final judgment appealable under NRAP 3A(b)(1) has been entered in the district court. See Lee v. GNLV Corp., 116 Nev. 424, 426, 996 P.2d 416, 417 (2000) (defining a final judgment). No other statute or court rule appears to allow an appeal from the challenged order. See Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC, 129 Nev. 343, 345, 301 P.3d 850, 851 (2013) (this court "may only consider appeals authorized by statute or court rule"). Accordingly, it appears that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal and ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Al4aug ,J LIZemA,D Silver , J. Stiglich

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Janet Trost, Settlement Judge Takos Law Group, Ltd. Maier Gutierrez & Associates Eighth District Court Clerk

2 • ••• .;,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brown v. MHC Stagecoach, LLC
301 P.3d 850 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2013)
Lee v. GNLV CORP.
996 P.2d 416 (Nevada Supreme Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
475 P.3d 774, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/just-vs-first-100-llc-nev-2020.