Jussen v. Bode

Nebraska Supreme Court

Jussen v. Bode

140 N.W. 771, 93 Neb. 490, 1913 Neb. LEXIS 103

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedMarch 28, 1913

DocketNo. 17,599

StatusPublished

This text of 140 N.W. 771 (Jussen v. Bode) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jussen v. Bode, 140 N.W. 771, 93 Neb. 490, 1913 Neb. LEXIS 103 (Neb. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Fawcett, J.

This suit was instituted in the district court for Richardson county to foreclose the mortgage involved in Bode v. Jussen, ante, p. 482. By agreement of parties it was argued and submitted with that case. Both cases rest upon substantially the same evidence. The district court upheld the mortgage and entered a decree of foreclosure. Defendants appeal. For the reasons stated in Bode v. Jussen, supra, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Reese, C. J., Barnes and Ross, JJ., concur. Letton, Sedgwick and Hamer, JJ., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fawcett, J.

This suit was instituted in the district court for Richardson county to foreclose the mortgage involved in Bode v. Jussen, ante, p. 482. By agreement of parties it was argued and submitted with that case. Both cases rest upon substantially the same evidence. The district court upheld the mortgage and entered a decree of foreclosure. Defendants appeal. For the reasons stated in Bode v. Jussen, supra, the judgment is

Affirmed.

Reese, C. J., Barnes and Ross, JJ., concur. Letton, Sedgwick and Hamer, JJ., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

140 N.W. 771, 93 Neb. 490, 1913 Neb. LEXIS 103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jussen-v-bode-neb-1913.