Jusden A. Kukowski, Jesse David Hartung D/B/A H & H Hauling, Inc. and H & H Hauling, Inc. v. Bryce G. Burton

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 24, 2014·No. 01-14-00129-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Jusden A. Kukowski, Jesse David Hartung d/b/a H & H Hauling, Inc and H & H Hauling, Inc. v. Bryce G. Burton

Appellate case number: 01-14-00129-CV

Trial court case number: 13CV1174

Trial court: 56th District Court of Galveston County

On April 17, 2014, appellants Jusden Kukowski, Jesse David Hartung and H&H Hauling, Inc. filed a Motion for Clarification of Appellate Court’s Order Granting Motion for Stay of Trial Court Proceedings, In Part. The motion for clarification is GRANTED, and our clarification of our April 14, 2014 order is as follows: Discovery directed towards appellees is not stayed. Discovery directed towards intervenors is not stayed. Specifically, the oral depositions of intervenors Tana Burton and Thomas Burton are not stayed. It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown X Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: April 24, 2014

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jusden A. Kukowski, Jesse David Hartung D/B/A H & H Hauling, Inc. and H & H Hauling, Inc. v. Bryce G. Burton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2014).

Jusden A. Kukowski, Jesse David Hartung D/B/A H & H Hauling, Inc. and H & H Hauling, Inc. v. Bryce G. Burton (Jusden A. Kukowski, Jesse David Hartung D/B/A H & H Hauling, Inc. and H & H Hauling, Inc. v. Bryce G. Burton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.