Juris v. Cantrell
This text of Juris v. Cantrell (Juris v. Cantrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
05/13/2020
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 20-0121
DA 20-0121 _________________
DR. RUTH A. JURIS,
Plaintiff and Appellant,
v. ORDER LANA E. CANTRELL d/b/a LANA CANTRELL LAW OFFICE,
Defendant and Appellee. _________________
On March 2, 2020, counsel for Appellee Lana E. Cantrell filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. The Court granted the motion on March 5, 2020. Appellant filed her opening brief on May 6, 2020. On May 12, 2020, Appellant filed a motion for a Rule 10 notice asking the Court for an order directing Appellant to provide notice regarding the withdrawal to Appellee, pursuant to Rule 10 of the Uniform District Court Rules, which would grant Appellee twenty-one days to retain a new attorney, and thirty days thereafter to file a response brief. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is DENIED. Pursuant to M. R. App. P. 13, Appellee has until June 5, 2020, within which to file a response brief. If the response brief or a motion for extension of time to file the response brief is not filed by June 5, this matter will be deemed submitted upon Appellant’s brief.
Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court May 13 2020
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Juris v. Cantrell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juris-v-cantrell-mont-2020.