Jurgielewiez v. Jurgielewiez
This text of 24 La. Ann. 77 (Jurgielewiez v. Jurgielewiez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff having obtained a judgment of separation from bed and hoard on the twenty-eighth of June, 1867, took a rule on the defendant on the eighteenth of March, 1868, to show cause why a decree of divoree a vinculo matrimonii should not he rendered, and on the twenty-third day of March, 1868, a final judgment was rendered on the rule in favor of the plaintiff, notwithstanding defendant had made no appearance. From this judgment the defendant has appealed.
We think the judgment is a nullity because the defendant was not legally cited and she did not appear to defend the suit. 18 An. 455, Gernon v. Hickey; 10 Au. 156, Leachaud v. Wife.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the district court he annulled and that the i>laintiff pay the costs of suit.
Rehearing refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 La. Ann. 77, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jurgielewiez-v-jurgielewiez-la-1872.