Juravin v. Kennedy

CourtDistrict Court, M.D. Florida
DecidedFebruary 27, 2023
Docket5:22-cv-00606
StatusUnknown

This text of Juravin v. Kennedy (Juravin v. Kennedy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Juravin v. Kennedy, (M.D. Fla. 2023).

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA OCALA DIVISION

DON KARL JURAVIN,

Appellant,

v. Case No: 5:22-cv-606-GAP

DENNIS KENNEDY and PSR DEVELOPERS LLC,

Appellees.

ORDER Before the Court, upon referral, is Appellant Don Karl Juravin’s “motion by way of objection to order from January 30, 2023.” (Doc. 16). Juravin’s motion objects to the transfer of the case, arguing that the notice of a related action filed by Dennis Kennedy inaccurately represented that the instant case was related to 5:21-cv-514, 6:21-cv-1921, and 6:21-cv-1922. However, under Local Rule 1.07(a)(2)(A), “[i]f the transferee judge consents, the judge to whom the clerk assigns an action can transfer the action at any time and for any reason.” M.D. Fla. Local Rule 1.07(a)(2)(A). Here, the January 30, 2023, Order states that the case was transferred “to the Honorable Gregory A. Presnell, with his consent[.]” (Doc. 13). Accordingly, Juravin’s objection that the transfer was improper because the cases are unrelated is OVERRULED. Moreover, Juravin argues that he is concerned about the Court’s impartiality because Judge Presnell “has previously shown willingness to rule emphatically and strongly in favor of the Chapter 7 Trustee against the Debtor and his family in cases.” (Doc. 16 at 2). However, “judicial rulings alone almost never constitute a valid basis for a bias or partiality motion.” Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994). Accordingly, Juravin’s objection as to the Court’s impartiality is OVERRULED. Accordingly, the transfer was proper, and Juravin’s motion, to the extent it can be construed as requesting a reversal of the transfer, is DENIED. DONE and ORDERED in Ocala, Florida on February 27, 2023. ee PHILIP R. LAMMENS United States Magistrate Judge Copies furnished to: Counsel of Record Unrepresented Parties

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Liteky v. United States
510 U.S. 540 (Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Juravin v. Kennedy, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juravin-v-kennedy-flmd-2023.