Jupiter v. State
974 So. 2d 1214, 2008 WL 495415
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 26, 2008·No. 1D07-5910·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Lee JUPITER, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Sonya M. Rudenstine, Gainesville, for Petitioner.
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Tallahassee Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Prior report: 833 So.2d 169.
PER CURIAM.
DENIED. See In re Amendments to Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 9.141 and Rule 9.142, 969 So.2d 357 (Fla.2007); see also, Mendez-Perez v. Perez-Perez, 656 So.2d 458 (Fla.1995).
WEBSTER, BENTON, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jupiter v. State, 974 So. 2d 1214, 2008 WL 495415 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
974 So. 2d 1214 (Jupiter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McCullough v. State
974 So. 2d 1214 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)