Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner's, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner's, Inc.

614 So. 2d 52, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2447, 1993 WL 64831

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 10, 1993

DocketNo. 92-0793

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 614 So. 2d 52 (Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner's, Inc., 614 So. 2d 52, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2447, 1993 WL 64831 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the appellee, arguing this court’s recent decision in the underlying appeal, Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner’s Inc., 607 So.2d 491 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), requires a reversal for a redetermination of the prevailing party. We agree and reverse.

In the underlying appeal, this court affirmed the trial court’s determination that the appellee was justified in terminating its lease, but reversed and remanded for a determination of the amount of real estate tax money appellee owed appellant. Since this determination may change who is the prevailing party, we reverse and remand the award of attorney’s fees and costs to appellee. Upon remand, the trial court may again award attorney’s fees and costs based on its redetermination as to the prevailing party.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the appellee, arguing this court’s recent decision in the underlying appeal, Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner’s Inc., 607 So.2d 491 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), requires a reversal for a redetermination of the prevailing party. We agree and reverse.

In the underlying appeal, this court affirmed the trial court’s determination that the appellee was justified in terminating its lease, but reversed and remanded for a determination of the amount of real estate tax money appellee owed appellant. Since this determination may change who is the prevailing party, we reverse and remand the award of attorney’s fees and costs to appellee. Upon remand, the trial court may again award attorney’s fees and costs based on its redetermination as to the prevailing party.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

614 So. 2d 52, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2447, 1993 WL 64831, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jupiter-mall-realty-corp-v-rosners-inc-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack