Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner's, Inc.

614 So. 2d 52, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2447, 1993 WL 64831
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 10, 1993·No. No. 92-0793·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant appeals the trial court’s order awarding attorney’s fees and costs to the appellee, arguing this court’s recent decision in the underlying appeal, Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner’s Inc., 607 So.2d 491 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992), requires a reversal for a redetermination of the prevailing party. We agree and reverse.

In the underlying appeal, this court affirmed the trial court’s determination that the appellee was justified in terminating its lease, but reversed and remanded for a determination of the amount of real estate tax money appellee owed appellant. Since this determination may change who is the prevailing party, we reverse and remand the award of attorney’s fees and costs to appellee. Upon remand, the trial court may again award attorney’s fees and costs based on its redetermination as to the prevailing party.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner's, Inc., 614 So. 2d 52, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 2447, 1993 WL 64831 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

614 So. 2d 52 (Jupiter Mall Realty Corp. v. Rosner's, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wells Fargo Bank v. Bird
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Marty v. Bainter
727 So. 2d 1124 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)