Junqing Wu v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 562 F. App'x 574 (Junqing Wu v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Junqing Wu, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration *575 judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition for review and we remand.
Wu testified Chinese police detained and mistreated him due to his Christian house church activities. Wu testified police released him after telling him he was not allowed to leave his home, and after he signed a pledge promising not to participate in Christian activities in future. The BIA found Wu’s detention and physical mistreatment did not rise to the level of past persecution. In reaching this conclusion, the BIA did not assess Wu’s testimony that he could not work because he had to stay at home, and had to transfer his ownership stake in his business, nor did the BIA address the import of the limitations on Wu’s participation in his religion. Thus, we remand Wu’s asylum and withholding of removal claims for the agency to assess these issues in the first instance. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18, 123 S.Ct. 353, 154 L.Ed.2d 272 (2002) (per curiam); Korablina v. INS, 158 F.3d 1038, 1044 (9th Cir.1998) (“The key question is whether, looking at the cumulative effect of all the incidents a petitioner has suffered, the treatment [he] received rises to the level of persecution.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
562 F. App'x 574, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/junqing-wu-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2014.