Junker v. Kuhnen

Appellate Court of Illinois

Junker v. Kuhnen

18 Ill. App. 478, 1886 Ill. App. LEXIS 17

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedMarch 31, 1886

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 18 Ill. App. 478 (Junker v. Kuhnen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Junker v. Kuhnen, 18 Ill. App. 478, 1886 Ill. App. LEXIS 17 (Ill. Ct. App. 1886).

Pincite

Opinion

Moran, J.

This was an action of debt commenced November 22, 1875, to recover against plaintiff in error, as a stockholder of the Germania Insurance Company of Chicago, upon the liability created by section 16 of the General Insurance Law of 1869. The declaration alleges debt against the company; that the company is insolvent; that the whole amount of capital of the corporation never was paid in ; that no certificate of such payment was given, or recorded as required, that in fact no more than half the stock had been paid in; and stating cause of action against defendant, alleges: “That on and after said 27th day of July, A. D. 1871, and at the time of the accruing of plaintiff’s said claim, and at the time of the insolvency of said company, the defendant was a corporator and stockholder in said corporation, and had subscribed for and owned his shares of the capital stock thereof at the price named of one hundred dollars for each share, amounting to the sum of one thousand dollars.”

Plaintiff’s loss occurred October 9, 1871.

Defendant below pleaded the two-year Statute of Limitations by a plea in proper form, and to such plea the court sustained a demurrer, and rendered judgment for amount claimed as damages.

The liability sought to be enforced against plaintiff in error is in the way of a penalty. Weidenger v. Spruance, 101 Ill. 278 ; and to the recovery of such penalty, the Statute of Limitations is a good plea. Gridley v. Barnes, 103 Ill. 211. It was error to sustain the demurrer, and the cause must therefore be reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moran, J.

This was an action of debt commenced November 22, 1875, to recover against plaintiff in error, as a stockholder of the Germania Insurance Company of Chicago, upon the liability created by section 16 of the General Insurance Law of 1869. The declaration alleges debt against the company; that the company is insolvent; that the whole amount of capital of the corporation never was paid in ; that no certificate of such payment was given, or recorded as required, that in fact no more than half the stock had been paid in; and stating cause of action against defendant, alleges: “That on and after said 27th day of July, A. D. 1871, and at the time of the accruing of plaintiff’s said claim, and at the time of the insolvency of said company, the defendant was a corporator and stockholder in said corporation, and had subscribed for and owned his shares of the capital stock thereof at the price named of one hundred dollars for each share, amounting to the sum of one thousand dollars.”

Plaintiff’s loss occurred October 9, 1871.

Defendant below pleaded the two-year Statute of Limitations by a plea in proper form, and to such plea the court sustained a demurrer, and rendered judgment for amount claimed as damages.

The liability sought to be enforced against plaintiff in error is in the way of a penalty. Weidenger v. Spruance, 101 Ill. 278 ; and to the recovery of such penalty, the Statute of Limitations is a good plea. Gridley v. Barnes, 103 Ill. 211. It was error to sustain the demurrer, and the cause must therefore be reversed and remanded.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 Ill. App. 478, 1886 Ill. App. LEXIS 17, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/junker-v-kuhnen-illappct-1886.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack