Junior Joseph v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 21, 2018·No. 5D18-511·Published

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

JUNIOR JOSEPH,

Petitioner,

v. Case No. 5D18-511

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

________________________________/

Opinion filed May 25, 2018

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, A Case of Original Jurisdiction.

Junior Joseph, pro se, Milton.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kristen L. Davenport, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

It appears from the record that a question was raised regarding Petitioner’s

competency to proceed to trial. Although the record indicates that the trial court appointed

experts to evaluate Petitioner and held a competency hearing, it did not enter an order

adjudicating Petitioner competent. On the face of the record, appellate counsel was

ineffective for not addressing this issue in Petitioner’s direct appeal. Accordingly, we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand this cause to the trial court to

attempt to make a retroactive competency determination, if possible, or, failing which, to

grant Petitioner a new trial once he is competent to proceed. See Camacho v. State, 225

So. 3d 272 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017).

We deny the petition as to all other grounds.

PETITION GRANTED and CASE REMANDED.

SAWAYA, ORFINGER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Junior Joseph v. State, (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Junior Joseph v. State (Junior Joseph v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

GIL CAMACHO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
225 So. 3d 272 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)