Junik v. Allstate Insurance

209 A.D.2d 989, 619 N.Y.S.2d 987

This text of 209 A.D.2d 989 (Junik v. Allstate Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Junik v. Allstate Insurance, 209 A.D.2d 989, 619 N.Y.S.2d 987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that plaintiffs failed to file a proof of loss, as alleged in their third affirmative defense. Plaintiffs raised a question of fact with respect to that defense by the affidavit of plaintiff David E. Junik, and thus defendants’ motion was properly denied. (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Notaro, J.—Summary Judgment.) Present—Pine, J. P., Law-ton, Fallon, Davis and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
209 A.D.2d 989, 619 N.Y.S.2d 987, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/junik-v-allstate-insurance-nyappdiv-1994.