Juniet v. Baltimore & O. S. W. Ry.

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Juniet v. Baltimore & O. S. W. Ry.

1 Hosea's Rep. 184

DecidedJuly 1, 1907

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Hosea's Rep. 184 (Juniet v. Baltimore & O. S. W. Ry.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Juniet v. Baltimore & O. S. W. Ry., 1 Hosea's Rep. 184 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1907).

Pincite

Opinion

Hosea, J.

These motions are well taken and will be granted. Section 5057, Revised Statutes, providing for the method of drafting petitions, requires “A statement of the facts constituting the cause of action, in ordinary and concise language.” While the striking out of parts designated is only a partial remedy of the unnecessary and confusing prolixity, the petition should be re-formed and redrafted, and it is so ordered at the costs of plaintiff. School Section 16 (Tr.) v. Odlin, 8 Ohio St., 293, 297, 298.

Motions granted and petition to be reformed at plaintiff’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hosea, J.

These motions are well taken and will be granted. Section 5057, Revised Statutes, providing for the method of drafting petitions, requires “A statement of the facts constituting the cause of action, in ordinary and concise language.” While the striking out of parts designated is only a partial remedy of the unnecessary and confusing prolixity, the petition should be re-formed and redrafted, and it is so ordered at the costs of plaintiff. School Section 16 (Tr.) v. Odlin, 8 Ohio St., 293, 297, 298.

Motions granted and petition to be reformed at plaintiff’s costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Hosea's Rep. 184, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/juniet-v-baltimore-o-s-w-ry-ohsuperctcinci-1907.