Jung v. Jung
This text of 270 A.D. 896 (Jung v. Jung) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
These are consolidated appeals in an action to recover a money judgment for sums due under compromise agreements executed by all the beneficiaries of an estate and for appointment of a receiver of rents. On appeal by certain defendants from an order denying their motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. On appeal by plaintiff from an order denying her motion for appointment of a receiver of real property and of the rents and profits of said real property, order affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Ariel, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
270 A.D. 896, 61 N.Y.S.2d 522, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jung-v-jung-nyappdiv-1946.