Jung Forwarding Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Jung Forwarding Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 460

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1957

DocketNo. 61274; protest 275863-K (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 39 Cust. Ct. 460 (Jung Forwarding Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jung Forwarding Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 460 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items described as “F. L. Projectors” and “Stands 1701” consist as a unit of incandescent lamps, designed to be operated by compressed air and kerosene, and that said units are composed wholly or in chief value of base metal, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, and not wholly or in chief value of lead, tin, or tin plate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items described as “F. L. Projectors” and “Stands 1701” consist as a unit of incandescent lamps, designed to be operated by compressed air and kerosene, and that said units are composed wholly or in chief value of base metal, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, and not wholly or in chief value of lead, tin, or tin plate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 Cust. Ct. 460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jung-forwarding-co-v-united-states-cusc-1957.