Jung Forwarding Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Jung Forwarding Co. v. United States

39 Cust. Ct. 460

United States Customs Court·Decided October 15, 1957·No. No. 61274; protest 275863-K (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items described as “F. L. Projectors” and “Stands 1701” consist as a unit of incandescent lamps, designed to be operated by compressed air and kerosene, and that said units are composed wholly or in chief value of base metal, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, and not wholly or in chief value of lead, tin, or tin plate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items described as “F. L. Projectors” and “Stands 1701” consist as a unit of incandescent lamps, designed to be operated by compressed air and kerosene, and that said units are composed wholly or in chief value of base metal, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, and not wholly or in chief value of lead, tin, or tin plate, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said items.

Jung Forwarding Co. v. United States, 39 Cust. Ct. 460 (cusc 1957).

Pincite

39 Cust. Ct. 460 (Jung Forwarding Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.