Junek v. Hezeau

12 La. Ann. 248
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided April 15, 1857·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Buchanan, J.

The defendant has appealed from a decree of the following tenor:

“It is, therefore, ordered, adjudged and decreed, that the plnintiffs are entitled to have an account of all the receipts and expenditures of the whole of the property known as the cemetary of St. Vincent de Paul, and that the books and papers of said cemetary, in whose hands soever they may be, be referred to auditors, to be selected by the parties, in order that an account may be stated between them.” /

A motion is made to dismiss the appeal on the ground, among others, that “thejudgment appealed from is not final, and does not divest the inferior court of its jurisdiction over the case.”

We think this ground is well taken. It was decided in Damis v. Preval, 6 Martin 422, that an appeal from an order submitting a cause to referees is premature.

It is, therefore, decreed that this appeal be dismissed, at the costs of appellant

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Junek v. Hezeau, 12 La. Ann. 248 (La. 1857).

12 La. Ann. 248 (Junek v. Hezeau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

A Better Place, Inc. v. Giani Inv. Co.
445 So. 2d 728 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1984)
Succession of Willis v. Willis
85 So. 2d 520 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1956)
Winsberg v. Winsberg
75 So. 2d 542 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1954)
State Ex Rel. Knighton v. Derryberry
177 So. 256 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1937)
Benham, Ziegler & Co. v. Imouledoux
144 So. 428 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1932)
Garland v. Dimitry
114 So. 718 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1927)