June Toney v. L'OreaL U.S.A., Inc., the Wella Corporation, and Wella Personal Care of North America, Inc.

Seventh Circuit

June Toney v. L'OreaL U.S.A., Inc., the Wella Corporation, and Wella Personal Care of North America, Inc.

400 F.3d 964, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1943, 2005 WL 408009

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in June Toney v. L'OreaL U.S.A., Inc., the Wella Corporation, and Wella Personal Care of North America, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 384 F.3d 486 →

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided February 3, 2005·No. 03-2184·Published

Opinion

*965 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, filed on October 1, 2004, by plaintiff-appellant,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED and the opinion and judgment issued on September 21, 2004, are VACATED.

Further, supplemental briefing is ORDERED and should be directed to the following question: Should Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass’n, 805 F.2d 663, 674-79 (7th Cir.1986) remain the controlling law in this circuit in light of Brown v. Ames, 201 F.3d 654 (5th Cir.2000); Landham v. Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc., 227 F.3d 619 (6th Cir.2000); and, Downing v. Abercrombie & Fitch, 265 F.3d 994 (9th Cir.2001)?

The supplemental briefs are limited to 15 pages. The supplemental briefs of the appellant and appellees are due by February 24, 2005.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*965 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing and petition for rehearing en banc, filed on October 1, 2004, by plaintiff-appellant,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED and the opinion and judgment issued on September 21, 2004, are VACATED.

Further, supplemental briefing is ORDERED and should be directed to the following question: Should Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass’n, 805 F.2d 663, 674-79 (7th Cir.1986) remain the controlling law in this circuit in light of Brown v. Ames, 201 F.3d 654 (5th Cir.2000); Landham v. Lewis Galoob Toys, Inc., 227 F.3d 619 (6th Cir.2000); and, Downing v. Abercrombie & Fitch, 265 F.3d 994 (9th Cir.2001)?

The supplemental briefs are limited to 15 pages. The supplemental briefs of the appellant and appellees are due by February 24, 2005.

June Toney v. L'OreaL U.S.A., Inc., the Wella Corporation, and Wella Personal Care of North America, Inc., 400 F.3d 964, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1943, 2005 WL 408009 (7th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

400 F.3d 964 (June Toney v. L'OreaL U.S.A., Inc., the Wella Corporation, and Wella Personal Care of North America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related