June D. Peterson v. William J. Cox, and Carl Hansen, Ind. & T/a Transport Helicopters, Inc

Third Circuit

June D. Peterson v. William J. Cox, and Carl Hansen, Ind. & T/a Transport Helicopters, Inc

422 F.2d 401, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10052

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 31, 1970·No. 17987·Published

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal the defendant Cox contends that the fact-findings made by the District Court in this non-jury trial are “clearly erroneous”, and that the District *402 Court applied erroneous legal standards in its disposition.

On review of the record we cannot say that the challenged fact-findings are “clearly erroneous”, or that the District Court erred as a matter of law in entering judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Cox.

The Order of Judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

On this appeal the defendant Cox contends that the fact-findings made by the District Court in this non-jury trial are “clearly erroneous”, and that the District *402 Court applied erroneous legal standards in its disposition.

On review of the record we cannot say that the challenged fact-findings are “clearly erroneous”, or that the District Court erred as a matter of law in entering judgment in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Cox.

The Order of Judgment of the District Court will be affirmed.

June D. Peterson v. William J. Cox, and Carl Hansen, Ind. & T/a Transport Helicopters, Inc, 422 F.2d 401, 1970 U.S. App. LEXIS 10052 (3d Cir. 1970).

Pincite

422 F.2d 401 (June D. Peterson v. William J. Cox, and Carl Hansen, Ind. & T/a Transport Helicopters, Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.