Junas v. Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation
This text of 2017 ND 130 (Junas v. Director, North Dakota Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[¶ 1] Caleb Junas appealed from a judgment affirming a Department of Transportation decision suspending his driving privileges for 91 days after he submitted to a warrantless blood test incident to arrest and the result of that test established an alcohol concentration above the legal limit. Junas argues he was illegally searched and seized before he submitted to a preliminary breath test and he thereafter did not voluntarily consent to a warrantless blood test incident to his arrest.
[¶ 2] We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(5) and (7), Beylund v. Levi, 2017 ND 30, 889 N.W.2d 907 (holding exclusionary rule and North Dakota law do not require exclusion of results of warrantless blood test in civil administrative license suspension proceeding), and Barrios-Flores v. Levi, 2017 ND 117, 894 N.W.2d 888 (holding law enforcement officer may *315 request onsite screening test of driver’s breath based on reasonable suspicion driver was driving while impaired).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 ND 130, 895 N.W.2d 314, 2017 WL 2461926, 2017 N.D. LEXIS 142, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/junas-v-director-north-dakota-department-of-transportation-nd-2017.