Jumper v. State
880 S.W.2d 584, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1023, 1994 WL 270472
Opinion
ORDER
Movant, Kevin Jumper, appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
The judgment of the motion court is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous; no error of law appears. An opinion would have no precedential value.
The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Jumper v. State, 880 S.W.2d 584, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1023, 1994 WL 270472 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
880 S.W.2d 584 (Jumper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.