Jumper v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Jumper v. State

627 So. 2d 1342, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13235, 1993 WL 533819

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 22, 1993·No. No. 92-03002·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Jumper’s conviction for burglary of a conveyance. We also affirm the imposition of court costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1991). However, costs of prosecution imposed pursuant to section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1991), in the amount of $400.00, must be stricken as the trial judge did not make the required assessment of the defendant’s financial resources. § 939.01(5), Fla.Stat.; Blanco-Diaz v. State, 618 So.2d 370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

FRANK, C.J., and SCHOONOVER and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Jumper’s conviction for burglary of a conveyance. We also affirm the imposition of court costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1991). However, costs of prosecution imposed pursuant to section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1991), in the amount of $400.00, must be stricken as the trial judge did not make the required assessment of the defendant’s financial resources. § 939.01(5), Fla.Stat.; Blanco-Diaz v. State, 618 So.2d 370 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993).

FRANK, C.J., and SCHOONOVER and BLUE, JJ., concur.

Jumper v. State, 627 So. 2d 1342, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 13235, 1993 WL 533819 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

627 So. 2d 1342 (Jumper v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related