Jump v. Jump
This text of 403 N.E.2d 454 (Jump v. Jump) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs (see Donigi v American Cyanamid Co., 43 NY2d 935). Although the order of the Appellate Division recites that the reversal was on the law, the memorandum of the Appellate Division makes clear that it was predicated on that court’s view of the weight of the evidence.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
403 N.E.2d 454, 49 N.Y.2d 783, 426 N.Y.S.2d 731, 1980 N.Y. LEXIS 2144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jump-v-jump-ny-1980.