Jump v. Ellis

100 F.2d 130, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2593
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedOctober 26, 1938
DocketNo. 1725
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 100 F.2d 130 (Jump v. Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Jump v. Ellis, 100 F.2d 130, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2593 (10th Cir. 1938).

Opinion

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree dismissing the bill in a proceeding in equity-brought by Josephine Jump, nee Strikeaxe, and James Strikeaxe, by his guardian Joe S. McGuire, against C. L. Ellis, Superintendent of the Osage Indian Agency.

The hill alleged these facts :

Josephine Jump, née Strikeaxe, and James Strikeaxe are full-blood Indians, duly enrolled as members of the Osage Tribe of Indians, and are the children and sole heirs of Bennie Strikeaxe, deceased. McGuire is the duly appointed, qualified, and acting guardian of James Strikeaxe, an incompetent. C. L. Ellis is the Superintendent of the Osage Indian School and also acts as Indian Agent of the Osage Indian Agency. Ellis, as such superintendent, has in his possession the tribal rolls of the Osage Tribe of Indians, including the tribal roll as it existed on January 1, 1906.

On December 31, 1881, the Osage Indians adopted their constitution. On that date there was on file in the Osage Agency a roll of the membership of the tribe as it then existed. Thereafter, until August 19, 1890, a new roll was made up at the beginning of each fiscal year. After the last-mentioned date, quarterly pajrments were required and new rolls were made up quarterly during each year.1 Each new roll was revised by adding thereto members of the tribe found to be entitled to enrollment, including newborn members, and by omitting from the revised rolls the names of those members who had died.

By rules and regulations adopted and promulgated by the Secretary of the Interior on April 1, 1904, it was provided that deceased Indians might be carried on the rolls for one quarterly payment after death.2 Thereafter the rolls were revised quarterly and designated as the March, June, September, and December annuity pay rolls for each year, respectively. In making up a new roll those members who had died prior to making the last quarterly payment were omitted. Applications for enrollment, including applications of newborn members, were presented to the Osage Council and if approved by the Council were added to the new roll.

The name of Bennie Strikeaxe appeared on the 1905 rolls and on the succeeding rolls up to and including the March 6, 1906, annuity pay roll. On or about December 1, 1905, the Osage Indian Agent prepared in duplicate a tribal roll on the form prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior, using the September, 1905, annuity roll as a basis. The name of Bennie Strikeaxe appeared upon the September, 1905, annuity pay roll opposite roll No. 582, and it was inscribed on the December, 1905, duplicate annuity pay roll at page 13, opposite roll No. 588, as a member of the tribe, and remained on the December roll when the same was completed and closed. On December 13, 3905, the Osage Indian Agent disbursed the funds allocated to Bennie Strikeaxe and his son, James Strikeaxe, to Foster Strikeaxe, who signed and receipted the annuity pay roll in duplicate and caused to be noted opposite roll No. 588 the word “crazy,” indicating that on December 13, 1905, Bennie Strikeaxe was insane. On December 30, 1905, the Osage Indian Agent duly certified to the December, 1905, duplicate annuity pay roll, which showed the members of the tribe and the amounts that had been paid to each member, and forwarded it, together with the receipts for the payments, to the Commissioner of "Indian Affairs at Washington, D. C. A duplicate of the December, 1905, roll remained in the Osage Indian Agent’s office.

The roll of the tribe made pursuant to the Osage Allotment Act of June 28, 1906, 34 Stat. 539, did not contain the name of Bennie Strikeaxe. After the adoption of such Allotment Act, the Commissioner of Indian Affairs sent a letter of instruction to the Osage Indian Agent, which read as follows :

“Washington, January 30, 1908.

“Subject: Requests certified roll of Osage Tribe,

“The U. S. Indian Agent,

“Osage Agency, Pawhuska, Oklahoma.

“Sir: In view of the provisions of the Act of Congress approved June 28, 1906 (34 Stat.L. 539), known as the Osage Allotment Act, it is desired that you prepare in triplicate as complete a roll as possible of the Osage Tribe of Indians and forward all parts to this office for approval by the Secretary of the Interior.

“The roll should consist of (1) names of the Osage tribal roll as it existed in your office on the first day of January, 1906; and (2d) of the names of all persons, including [132]*132adults and children, subsequently added thereto by direction of this office with the authority of the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with the provisions of section one of the act named.

“The column for remarks in the roll should show the date and file number of the authority for each name added to.the roll 'as it existed on the first day of January, nineteen hundred and six.’

“You should properly certify to the correctness of the roll.

“Very respectfully,

“C. F. Larrabee,

“Acting Commissioner.”

Subsequently to January 1, 1906, some person in the office of the Osage Indian Agency made certain lead pencil notations upon page 13 of the December, 1905, annuity payroll, as follows: Opposite roll No. 565 “Died December 22, 1905”; opposite roll No. 579 “Married Coleman — died February 21, 1906”;' and opposite the name of Bennie Strikeaxe, No. 588, “Died December 28, 1905.”

From and after April 1, 1904, the Osage Indian Agent kept an unofficial record of deaths occurring after that date. Such record of deaths recorded between July 1, 1905, and February 21, 1906, did not contain the name of Bennie Strikeaxe, and such record did not show the death of Bennie Strikeaxe on or prior to January 1, 1906.

The complainants now have an action pending in the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia against the Secretary of the Interior to enforce their rights as heirs oof Bennie Strikeaxe. They allege that it is necessary to the prosecution of that action that they have a true and correct copy of the roll of the Osage Indians as it existed on January 1, 1906, in the office of the United States Indian Agent at the Osage Agency, and that this cannot be secured until such roh be corrected to speak the truth by eliminating the pencil notations thereon.

The complainants pray for a decree adjudging that the lead pencil notations appearing on the December, 1905, annuity'pay roll on file in the office of the defendant are invalid, and commanding the defendant to erase and expunge therefrom such lead pencil notations, to prepare in triplicate an amended roll of the Osage Tribe of Indians as of January 1, 1906, to inscribe upon such triplicate roll the name of Bennie Strikeaxe, disclosing that Bennie Strikeaxe’s name appeared upon the Osage tribal roll as it existed on January 1, 1906, in the 'office of the United States Indian Agent at the Osage Indian Agency opposite roll No. 588, and to certify and forward the same to the Commissioner of Indian .Affairs.

At the threshold we are confronted with the question whether this suit may be maintained without joining the Secretary of the Interior as a party defendant.

Sections 462 and 463, R.S.2d Ed., 1878, 25 U.S.C.A. § 1 and 2, read as follows:

“Sec. 462.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States ex rel. Jump v. Ickes
117 F.2d 769 (D.C. Circuit, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 F.2d 130, 1938 U.S. App. LEXIS 2593, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jump-v-ellis-ca10-1938.