Julius Winkelmeyer Brewing Co. v. Whitney

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

Julius Winkelmeyer Brewing Co. v. Whitney

29 F. 780, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2400

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri

DecidedJanuary 13, 1887

StatusPublished

This text of 29 F. 780 (Julius Winkelmeyer Brewing Co. v. Whitney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Julius Winkelmeyer Brewing Co. v. Whitney, 29 F. 780, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2400 (circtedmo 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Treat, J.

The testimony in this case does not vary the construction of the acts of congress reached by the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Illinois in the case of Wolff v. Spalding, 26 Fed. Rep. 609. Accepting the decision of that court as the proper construction of the revenue act, and duly considering the testimony offered, the court holds that the plaintiff is entitled to recover.

Judgment will be given accordingly, for the sum of $417.75, and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Treat, J.

The testimony in this case does not vary the construction of the acts of congress reached by the circuit court of the United States for the Northern district of Illinois in the case of Wolff v. Spalding, 26 Fed. Rep. 609. Accepting the decision of that court as the proper construction of the revenue act, and duly considering the testimony offered, the court holds that the plaintiff is entitled to recover.

Judgment will be given accordingly, for the sum of $417.75, and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 F. 780, 1887 U.S. App. LEXIS 2400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julius-winkelmeyer-brewing-co-v-whitney-circtedmo-1887.