Julius v. State
539 So. 2d 457, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1, 1989 WL 24611
Opinion
We have considered the contentions of the appellant in this cause and affirm it on the same grounds as those set out in the order of the circuit court.
Accordingly, the judgment of the circuit court denying appellant’s petition under Rule 20, A.R.Crim.P.Temp., is due to be, and hereby is, affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Julius v. State, 539 So. 2d 457, 1989 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 1, 1989 WL 24611 (Ala. Ct. App. 1989).
539 So. 2d 457 (Julius v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.