Julius v. State

584 So. 2d 1288, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 1382, 1989 WL 253895
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided November 7, 1989·No. 82-1146·Published

Opinions

ORDER

The petitioner having filed a motion for stay of execution, a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and an application for appropriate relief, and the same having been submitted and duly considered by the Court, and

The Court having found that the claims contained in the motion, petition, and application are barred on procedural default grounds because they were not raised at trial, on direct appeal, or in the two prior post-conviction proceedings that were filed in the courts of this state,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for stay of execution, petition for writ of habe-as corpus, and application for appropriate relief are denied.

JONES, ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON, STEAGALL and KENNEDY, JJ., concur. MADDOX, J., concurs, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Julius v. State, 584 So. 2d 1288, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 1382, 1989 WL 253895 (Ala. 1989).

584 So. 2d 1288 (Julius v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Beck v. State
396 So. 2d 645 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)