Julius v. State

584 So. 2d 1288, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 1382, 1989 WL 253895
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedNovember 7, 1989
Docket82-1146
StatusPublished

This text of 584 So. 2d 1288 (Julius v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Julius v. State, 584 So. 2d 1288, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 1382, 1989 WL 253895 (Ala. 1989).

Opinions

ORDER

The petitioner having filed a motion for stay of execution, a petition for writ of habeas corpus, and an application for appropriate relief, and the same having been submitted and duly considered by the Court, and

The Court having found that the claims contained in the motion, petition, and application are barred on procedural default grounds because they were not raised at trial, on direct appeal, or in the two prior post-conviction proceedings that were filed in the courts of this state,

IT IS ORDERED that the motion for stay of execution, petition for writ of habe-as corpus, and application for appropriate relief are denied.

JONES, ALMON, SHORES, ADAMS, HOUSTON, STEAGALL and KENNEDY, JJ., concur. MADDOX, J., concurs, with opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Beck v. State
396 So. 2d 645 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1981)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
584 So. 2d 1288, 1989 Ala. LEXIS 1382, 1989 WL 253895, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/julius-v-state-ala-1989.